CORE COURSE / 020

Find an Opportunity You Can Explore

Bring your investigation together in a short opportunity brief and choose one affordable action that will resolve an important uncertainty.

What you will learn

  • Compare opportunities against your actual resources.
  • Write a brief separating evidence from assumptions.
  • Choose a next action with a clear review rule.

Choose for the next step, not for your entire life

An opportunity does not have to become a permanent career or a full business to deserve exploration. You are choosing where to place the next limited amount of attention. List a few possibilities and compare them on the same dimensions: the clarity of the problem, access to people affected, relevant abilities, time required, permissions, cost, and what you could learn. Avoid assigning precise scores when the underlying information is mostly guesswork. A brief explanation of a tradeoff is often more honest than a total that pretends uncertainty has disappeared. Keep one promising alternative so you do not feel trapped by the first choice.

Match the opportunity to resources you can actually use

Distinguish having a resource in theory from being able to use it when needed. You may know a skilled person who is unavailable, own equipment you cannot transport, or have evenings free only on certain weeks. Write a realistic inventory of time, skills, access, money, and support. Identify any essential gap. If an idea depends on permission you do not have or money needed for basic responsibilities, investigate another version before committing. Constraints can guide a smaller design: a one-session workshop, a limited editing service, or an observational visit may answer useful questions without requiring the full venture to exist.

Write a one-page opportunity brief

Use six short entries: the people, the problem, their current workaround, the contribution you could make, supporting evidence, and the largest uncertainty. Include dates and sources where they matter. A statement such as “two interviewees described trouble comparing repair estimates” should stay that specific. Do not upgrade it to “everyone needs my comparison service.” Add a rough description of how the work would be delivered and who would decide or pay. This brief is useful because another person can challenge it. If it contains only inspiring language, it will be difficult to tell what you have learned or what needs checking next.

Define a trial and its decision rule

Choose an action that targets the largest uncertainty rather than the most enjoyable part of the project. If access to users is unknown, creating a logo will not resolve it. You might request three relevant conversations, make a simple sample, or price the resources needed for one delivery. Set a time and spending limit, then define what would justify continuing, changing the proposal, or stopping. These thresholds are your practical decision rules, not scientific proof of a market. At the review, preserve what you learned even if the answer is no. A rejected idea can leave a clearer understanding of people, costs, and your own preferences.

Make the review appointment as concrete as the trial itself. Decide where you will record the result and which person, if anyone, can help you challenge an overly optimistic interpretation of it.

FICTIONAL PRACTICE CASE

Fictional case: Sara chooses a modest experiment

Sara has two ideas: organizing neighborhood events and helping small clubs edit newsletters. She enjoys both, but event work depends on venue access and weekends she cannot reliably promise. She already knows two club organizers and can edit one sample during a weekday evening. Her brief states that she has seen confusing newsletters but has not established willingness to pay for editing. She asks permission to prepare a sample from public material and requests specific feedback on usefulness and workflow. After a week she will decide whether to investigate a paid trial. Her choice is about a feasible next step, not a declaration that event work is permanently impossible.

Your practical assignment

  1. Compare two opportunities using the same practical dimensions.
  2. Write the six-entry brief for the more feasible investigation.
  3. Identify its largest unanswered question and a low-cost action that addresses it.
  4. Schedule a review and write conditions for continuing, modifying, or stopping.

Check your understanding

You are unsure whether you can reach potential users. Which action addresses the uncertainty most directly?

Further reading

My notebook